Rubric Assessment Modes

RCampus supports four assessment modes, each designed for a different workflow. Choose a mode when setting up an assignment — it determines how raters interact with the rubric and how final scores are calculated.

Applies to: Rubrics, Assignments

Quick Comparison

Mode	Who rates	Sees prior ratings?	How final score is set
Single/Sequential	One or more raters	Yes — shared view	The active assessment is the final score
Multi-Rater/Juried	Multiple raters independently	No — blind to each other	Scores are averaged after all raters submit
Collaborative	Multiple raters, each owns sections	Only their own sections	Sections are combined into one rubric
Moderated (iRubric Rapid only)	Multiple raters + a designated moderator	Moderator sees all; raters are blind	Moderator issues the final score

Single/Sequential Assessment

In Single/Sequential mode, there is one rubric per evaluatee that any authorized rater can open and score. If multiple raters are involved, they share access to the same assessment — one rater may start it and another may finish it. There is no averaging or combining step; the current state of the rubric is the final score.

Typical use	Solo rater or shared rating within a team
Final score	Whatever is saved in the rubric at the time of publishing
Self-assessment	Available as a separate tab
Combine step required?	No

Example: A course has two co-instructors. Either one can open an evaluatee's rubric and score it. If both make changes, the last saved version is what the evaluatee sees.

How It Works

1. Open the rubric for an evaluatee — Select the evaluatee from the list on the Score Rubrics page. The rubric opens in the right pane.
2. Score each criterion — Click the appropriate level for each rubric criterion. Add comments where needed.
3. Save and publish — Save the rubric. When all evaluatees are scored, publish results to make them visible.

Multi-Rater/Juried Assessment

In Multi-Rater/Juried mode, each rater scores evaluatees independently without seeing other raters' ratings. Once the team is satisfied with the coverage — there is no required minimum — any rater can trigger the final score calculation, which averages all submitted assessments per evaluatee.

Typical use	Jury-style assessment, inter-rater reliability studies, large assignments with a shared rating load
Final score	Average of all submitted rater assessments
Self-assessment	Available as a separate tab; not included in the average
Combine step required?	Yes — must click "Calculate final grades"

Example: Five raters share a cohort of 30 evaluatees. Each rater scores roughly 6 evaluatees, though some may be rated by 2–3 raters for reliability. When the team is satisfied, any rater clicks "Calculate final grades" to average all ratings and prepare them for publishing.

How It Works

1. Each rater scores their assigned evaluatees — Raters open individual evaluatee rubrics and score independently. They cannot see other raters' ratings during this phase.
2. Review coverage across the cohort — The evaluatee list shows how many assessments each evaluatee has received. The team decides when coverage is sufficient.
3. Calculate final grades — Any rater clicks "Calculate final grades" in the assignment toolbar. This averages all submitted assessments per evaluatee and locks the scores.
4. Review and publish — Switch to the "Multi-rater results" tab to review each evaluatee's combined score and flag any criteria with high disagreement between raters before publishing.

Note: Criteria where rater scores differ by 2 or more points are automatically flagged. Review flagged criteria before publishing — the averaged score will still be used, but you may want to discuss the disagreement with your team first.

Warning: Clicking "Calculate final grades" applies to all evaluatees at once. Make sure your team has completed enough assessments before triggering this step, as it locks the scores.

Viewing Other Raters' Assessments

After the calculate step, you can view each rater's individual assessment by selecting their name in the rater tabs at the top of the rubric pane. During the active assessment phase (before calculating), raters can only see their own ratings.

Collaborative Assessment

In collaborative mode, the rubric is divided into sections and each rater is responsible for scoring their assigned sections only. No single rater scores the complete rubric — the full picture is assembled from all raters' contributions. This is useful when different raters have expertise in different areas of the rubric.

Typical use	Interdisciplinary assessments where different raters own different criteria
Final score	All sections combined into one complete rubric score
Self-assessment	Available as a separate tab
Combine step required?	Yes — sections are merged after all raters complete their sections

Example: A capstone project rubric has six criteria. The writing assessor scores the three communication criteria; the subject-matter assessor scores the three technical criteria. The final score reflects all six criteria.

Moderated Assessment

Note: Moderated assessment is available exclusively in iRubric Rapid.

Moderated assessment combines the objectivity of independent multi-rater scoring with a human oversight step. Raters score evaluatees independently without seeing each other's work. A designated moderator then reviews all ratings side by side and issues the official final score — which may differ from the average if the moderator judges it appropriate.

Typical use	High-stakes assessments, accreditation reviews, situations where human judgment must override averaging
Final score	Set by the moderator after reviewing all ratings
Self-assessment	Available; moderator can view as reference
Combine step required?	Yes — moderator submits the final assessment
Availability	iRubric Rapid only

Example: Three assessors each score a thesis defense independently. The department chair, acting as moderator, reviews all three assessments and issues the official score — taking into account the ratings but applying their own judgment where raters disagree significantly.

Difference from Multi-Rater/Juried

Both moderated and Multi-Rater/Juried modes involve multiple raters scoring independently. The key difference is how the final score is determined:

	Multi-Rater/Juried	Moderated
Final score set by	Automatic average	Moderator's judgment
Human review of disagreements	Optional (flagged for review)	Required (moderator decides)
Can override the average?	No	Yes
Best for	Shared rating load, reliability checks	High-stakes, accreditation, appeals
Availability	All plans	iRubric Rapid only

How to Choose a Mode

If you are unsure which mode to use, these questions can help narrow it down.

Is only one rater responsible for scoring?

Use Single/Sequential. Even if multiple raters have access, Single/Sequential mode keeps things simple with one rubric per evaluatee.

Do multiple raters each need to score the same evaluatee independently?

Use Multi-Rater/Juried if you want the final score to be an automatic average, or Moderated (iRubric Rapid only) if you need a designated person to review all ratings and issue the score manually.

Do different raters own different parts of the rubric?

Use Collaborative. Each rater scores only their assigned criteria, and the sections are combined into one complete rubric.

Is this a high-stakes assessment where averaging is not sufficient?

Use Moderated (iRubric Rapid only). A moderator can review all ratings and exercise judgment before the score is finalized — particularly useful for thesis reviews, accreditation portfolios, or any situation where institutional accountability matters.

Note: You can change the assessment mode of an assignment before any scoring has begun. Once any rater has submitted a rating, the mode is locked.